Virtue is not a state you arrive at. It is a practice you return to.
The Stoics identified four cardinal virtues: wisdom, justice, courage, and temperance. These were not innate gifts or moral achievements. They were capacities that required constant exercise. Like a muscle, they developed through use and atrophied through neglect.
Crucially, the Stoics did not believe you either had good character or you did not. They believed character was the ongoing result of the choices you made, day after day, in small moments and large ones. Marcus Aurelius, by any account a man of considerable virtue, spent his journals examining his own failures and deficiencies. Not because he was self-flagellating, but because he understood that character was never finished.
This is a gentler and more accurate framing than the idea of defects to be removed. Defects implies a fixed flaw. The Stoic view is closer to: here are the places where your capacity for wisdom, justice, courage, or temperance has not yet developed sufficiently. Let us work on those.
"No man is more unhappy than he who never faces adversity. For he is not permitted to prove himself."
Seneca, On Providence
Being entirely ready is doing a lot of work in this step. It is not a passive state, waiting for something to be done to you. It is an active orientation toward your own development, a genuine willingness to be different from how you have been.
For many people in recovery, certain character patterns have been protective at some point. The tendency to control everything came from somewhere real. The difficulty with vulnerability came from somewhere real. Being entirely ready does not mean pretending these patterns appeared from nowhere. It means being willing to examine them honestly and to practise differently.
The Stoic framing is useful here: you are not having flaws extracted. You are building capacities. The work is not about what gets taken away. It is about what grows in its place.
Write down two or three patterns in yourself that you would describe as defects. For each one, ask: what was this pattern once trying to protect? What would the opposite pattern, the virtue, look like in practice for you specifically? Not in the abstract, but in the actual situations of your daily life.